{"pk":28850,"title":"Outcomes Speak Louder than Actions?\nTesting a Challenge to the Two-Process Model of Moral Judgment","subtitle":null,"abstract":"Curiously, people assign less punishment to a person who\nattempts and fails to harm somebody if their intended victim\nhappens to suffer the harm for coincidental reasons. This\n“blame blocking” effect provides an important evidence in\nsupport of the two-process model of moral judgment\n(Cushman, 2008). Yet, recent proposals suggest that it might\nbe due to an unintended interpretation of the dependent\nmeasure in cases of coincidental harm (Prochownik, 2017; also\nMalle, Guglielmo, & Monroe, 2014). If so, this would deprive\nthe two-process model of an important source of empirical\nsupport. We report and discuss results that speak against this\nalternative account.","language":"eng","license":{"name":"","short_name":"","text":null,"url":""},"keywords":[{"word":"blame blocking; two-process model; punishment;\noutcomes; actions; pragmatics"}],"section":"Papers with Poster Presentations","is_remote":true,"remote_url":"https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8mq6491t","frozenauthors":[{"first_name":"Karolina","middle_name":"","last_name":"Prochownik","name_suffix":"","institution":"Ruhr University Bochum","department":""},{"first_name":"Fiery","middle_name":"A.","last_name":"Cushman","name_suffix":"","institution":"Harvard University","department":""}],"date_submitted":null,"date_accepted":null,"date_published":"2019-01-01T18:00:00Z","render_galley":null,"galleys":[{"label":"PDF","type":"pdf","path":"https://journalpub.escholarship.org/cognitivesciencesociety/article/28850/galley/18721/download/"}]}