{"pk":31259,"title":"When Can Visual images Be Re-Interpreted? Non-Chronometric Tests of Pictorialism","subtitle":null,"abstract":"The question of re-interpreting images can be seen as a new focus for the imagery debate since the possibility would appear to be a direct prediction of the pictorial account Finke, Pinker and Farah (1989) have claimed that their results \"refute\" the earlier negative evidence of Chambers and Reisberg (1985), while Peterson, Kihlstrom, Rose & Glisky (1992) have used the ambiguous stimuli of Chambers and Reisberg to show that under certain conditions, these images may be reinterpreted after all. By employing newly devised tasks, our o w n experiments have provided further conflicting evidence concerning the conditions under which images can and cannot be reinterpreted. W e consider their bearing on the fundamental 'format* issue which neither Finke et al (1989) nor Peterson et al. (1992) address directly.","language":"eng","license":{"name":"","short_name":"","text":null,"url":""},"keywords":[],"section":"Talks","is_remote":true,"remote_url":"https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5r46x66h","frozenauthors":[{"first_name":"Peter","middle_name":"","last_name":"Slezak","name_suffix":"","institution":"University of New South Wales","department":""}],"date_submitted":null,"date_accepted":null,"date_published":"1992-01-02T02:00:00+08:00","render_galley":null,"galleys":[{"label":"PDF","type":"pdf","path":"https://journalpub.escholarship.org/cognitivesciencesociety/article/31259/galley/22328/download/"}]}