{"pk":57182,"title":"Key Disability Rights Regulations Will Remain Authoritative in the Wake of Loper Bright: A Toolkit for Litigation","subtitle":null,"abstract":"This essay will explain why the Supreme Court’s recent decision in \nLoper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo\n—overruling the deference afforded regulatory interpretation in the Court’s well-established decision in \nChevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council\n—should not threaten a core of longstanding disability rights regulations. My goal is to provide a useful resource for litigators facing arguments challenging those regulations in the wake of \nLoper Bright\n.","language":"en","license":{"name":"","short_name":"","text":null,"url":""},"keywords":[],"section":"Articles","is_remote":true,"remote_url":"https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7140n8f3","frozenauthors":[{"first_name":"Amy","middle_name":"","last_name":"Robertson","name_suffix":"","institution":"","department":""}],"date_submitted":"2025-08-11T21:52:13Z","date_accepted":"2025-08-11T21:52:13Z","date_published":"2025-01-01T00:00:00Z","render_galley":null,"galleys":[{"label":"","type":"pdf","path":"https://journalpub.escholarship.org/ucladlj/article/57182/galley/43379/download/"}]}