The way people treat each other and the way they treat their environment are inextricably intertwined. Thus, it is unsurprising that five centuries of colonialism, genocide, slavery, apartheid, and racial discrimination have produced climate change, mass extinction, desertification, deforestation, and polluted air, water, and lands. The West has used international law to institutionalize unaccountability for its racism and environmental harms. This article argues that international law’s inability to stem accelerating ecological decline is attributable to and inseparable from the discipline’s racism, and vice versa. This article explores five legal techniques—comparison, objectification, exploitation, taming, and extermination—that produce racist and environmentally harmful outcomes while cloaked in the legitimacy of the law. The racializing of nature and the naturalizing of race through international law depend on the erasure of subaltern worldviews. But another international law is possible where diverse sustainable legal traditions heretofore silenced make international law on their own terms.
","language":null,"license":{"name":"Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0","short_name":"CC BY-NC-SA","text":"Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.