Skip to main content
Assessing Predictive Accuracy of Tornado Resilience Models Through Post-event Reconnaissance Data Analysis

Assessing Predictive Accuracy of Tornado Resilience Models Through Post-event Reconnaissance Data Analysis

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Pramodit Adhikari, Milad Roohi, Richard L. Wood, David Roueche

Abstract

Community resilience assessment under a given hazard scenario is commonly performed by representing the building inventory through archetypes and assigning fragility functions for multiple limit states to each archetype. However, because these archetypes and fragility functions may be developed from design provisions, mechanics-based analyses, expert judgment, or historical event data, their transferability to other risk contexts remains uncertain, and the errors introduced by such generalization are not yet well understood. This paper presents a framework for quantifying modeling error and evaluating the transferability limitations of archetype-based fragility models when applied beyond their original risk contexts. The framework integrates exposure data, hazard characterization, fragility-based damage analysis, post-event reconnaissance observations, and risk quantification to compare predicted and observed damage states. The framework is demonstrated across five tornado-affected communities from three tornado events, exposure conditions, and community contexts. Model performance is assessed at both community and building scales by characterizing discrepancies between field observations and model predictions. Statistical associations within the examined testbed conditions are evaluated to assess how effectively the models reproduce observed damage patterns. The resulting community testbeds provide quantitative evidence regarding modeling error, uncertainty, and transferability limitations under the examined event conditions, while supporting greater consistency between post-event reconnaissance and community model development. The findings demonstrate that current fragility frameworks, in their existing form and without systematic multi-event calibration, are not yet ready for generalized operational prediction and deployment across heterogeneous tornado environments.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5VZ16

Subjects

Civil and Environmental Engineering, Civil Engineering, Engineering

Keywords

community resilience, tornado damage assessment, field reconnaissance, uncertainty quantification, model transferability

Dates

Published: 2026-07-21 11:09

Last Updated: 2026-07-21 14:15

Older Versions

License

No Creative Commons license

Additional Metadata

Data Availability:
The codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Metrics

Views: 57

Downloads: 1