Skip to main content
Split-Spectrum InSAR for Reliable Ionospheric Correction: A Critical Review of Uncertainty, Validation, and Reproducibility

Split-Spectrum InSAR for Reliable Ionospheric Correction: A Critical Review of Uncertainty, Validation, and Reproducibility

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

MOHIT SHEODE 

Abstract

Split-spectrum interferometry provides a physically grounded means of separating dispersive ionospheric phase from non-dispersive deformation-related phase in Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar observations. Its practical reliability, however, depends on processing choices that are often reported incompletely and validated inconsistently. This critical narrative review examines the physical basis of range split-spectrum correction and synthesizes representative literature on sub-band design, sensor and acquisition-mode dependence, coherence loss, filtering, phase unwrapping, parameter errors, and time-series application. A structured reporting audit of 25 scholarly sources shows that sensor context is usually documented, whereas spectral design, reproducibility, and uncertainty are frequently only partially reported. The review identifies a central trade-off between increased sensitivity to frequency-dependent phase and reduced stability as usable sub-band bandwidth narrows. To make reliability quantitatively operational, it states the standard phase-separation coefficients, provides covariance-aware uncertainty propagation, and translates the method into a reproducible processing sequence. It proposes that an operational correction should be accompanied by three linked products: the estimated ionospheric phase, the corrected interferometric phase, and a spatially explicit uncertainty or reliability layer. A minimum reporting framework is developed for sensor context, spectral design, interferometric processing, ionospheric estimation, validation, reproducibility, and uncertainty. Cross-sensor benchmark datasets representing different radar bands, environments, coherence regimes, and acquisition modes are recommended. The resulting framework shifts evaluation from visual phase improvement toward transparent, quantitative, and reproducible evidence that the corrected deformation signal can be trusted.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5H79W

Subjects

Earth Sciences, Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

InSAR, ionospheric correction, reproducibility, split-spectrum interferometry, uncertainty quantification

Dates

Published: 2026-08-05 07:47

Last Updated: 2026-08-05 07:47

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data Availability:
No external observational dataset was used in the synthetic demonstration. The synthetic input arrays, derived numerical outputs, parameter settings, and figure-generating code underlying Figures 1 and 2 are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Metrics

Views: 62

Downloads: 2