This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
A cascade, not a flood: testing the competing accounts of the 26 August 2026 Lhende Khola–Bhote Koshi disaster
Downloads
Supplementary Files
Authors
Abstract
On 26 August 2026 a rock–ice mass detached above the Lhende Khola on the China–Nepal border, blocked the channel, and released a flow that travelled about 100 km down the Bhote Koshi and Trishuli, killing hundreds of people and removing about a tenth of Nepal's generating capacity in a single morning. Reporting produced mutually incompatible accounts of the cause, while the agency best placed to judge states the mechanism remains undetermined. Five positions on the trigger are held by credible parties; each makes a prediction, and three can now be tested. Neither the ICIMOD glacial lake inventory nor a seven-year Sentinel-2 water-occurrence record finds a pre-existing surface lake of consequence in the source catchment — two methods agreeing to within 4%, with the detection limit stated. A proposed sequence in which the failure dammed the river for 18–19 hours predict a seismic signal the USGS catalogue does not contain. A stage–area–volume relation from pre-event topography alone, without empirical coefficients, reproduces the reported lake area and identifies which valley is impounded. The catalogue also holds a second failure three hours later, publicly noted but never characterised. Finally, the widely cited figure for capacity lost is only the operational half of a two-part official figure.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X51J54
Subjects
Earth Sciences, Geomorphology, Glaciology, Hydrology, Physical Sciences and Mathematics
Keywords
cascading hazards, cascading hazardsrock–ice avalanche, rock–ice avalanche, landslide dam, glacial lake outburst flood, Bhote Koshi, Rasuwa
Dates
Published: 2026-09-02 15:36
Last Updated: 2026-09-02 15:36
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Metrics
Views: 25
Downloads: 0
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.