This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Surface-wave sensitivity to anisotropy in a 3D seismogeodynamics mantle plume model.
Downloads
Supplementary Files
Authors
Abstract
High-resolution anisotropic seismic images of the upper mantle provide fundamental constraints on mantle plume dynamics and mantle deformation. Seismic tomography has come far by using travel-time and waveform (phase) information but has exploited amplitude information only to a limited extent.
Here, we calculate adjoint sensitivity kernels to assess the value of incorporating amplitude information and to identify the elastic parameters that most effectively characterise mantle plumes in the uppermost mantle.
We first compute strain-induced mineral fabrics and the resulting full elastic tensor in a realistic 3D mantle plume setting.
Then, full-waveform computations are carried out within this medium to obtain kernels for fundamental-mode Rayleigh- and Love-wave amplitude (and phase) measurements for all the 21 elastic parameters controlling seismic anisotropy.
Finally, we explore the sensitivity of combined observables, such as Rayleigh-wave cross-component phase-delay differences and horizontal/vertical amplitude ratios (i.e., Rayleigh wave ellipticity).
Our gallery of phase and amplitude surface-wave adjoint kernels reveals strong and complex sensitivity of these measurements to shear-wave radial anisotropy and to second- and fourth-degree azimuthal anisotropy parameters.
We further show that amplitude measurements are highly sensitive to the same elastic tensor components as phase measurements, but with distinct spatial sensitivity patterns that complement phase measurements and strengthen constraints in anisotropic tomography inversions.
We find that our combined observables maximize sensitivity beneath and near receivers, highlighting their potential for constraining mantle flow in settings with sparse or logistically challenging instrumentation, such as in oceanic domains.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5MV44
Subjects
Earth Sciences, Geophysics and Seismology
Keywords
Seismic anisotropy, mantle plumes, waveform amplitude, adjoint method, amplitude kernel, seismic sensitivity
Dates
Published: 2026-09-14 19:31
Last Updated: 2026-09-14 19:31
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
None.
Data Availability:
The version of the code SPECFEM3D GLOBE used in this study, as well as the geodynamic input model, the result of the D-REX post-processing, the kernels and the parameter file used for the adjoint simulations can be downloaded from two online repositories (Rappisi et al. 2026; Desiderio et al. 2026). Figures were created with Matplotlib, PyVista and GMT (Hunter 2007; Sullivan & Kaszynski 2019; Wessel et al. 2026).
Metrics
Views: 46
Downloads: 3
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.