Skip to main content
A Probabilistic Catastrophe Risk Model for Site-Specific Tropical Cyclone Loss Quantification

A Probabilistic Catastrophe Risk Model for Site-Specific Tropical Cyclone Loss Quantification

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Kunal J. Rathore 

Abstract

Quantifying the financial risk posed by landfalling tropical cyclones requires statistical methods that extend beyond the limits of a short and non-stationary historical observational record. This paper presents the mathematical formulation of an open, modular probabilistic catastrophe risk model for site-specific tropical cyclone loss estimation, structured around the four components used throughout the catastrophe modeling industry: hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and financial loss. Storm intensities drawn from NOAA's HURDAT2 database over the satellite era (1970--2025) are fit to a continuous Weibull distribution via maximum likelihood estimation, from which a 10,000-year synthetic event catalog is generated and propagated to individual properties using a Holland-type wind-field decay model. The hazard catalog is evaluated against a synthetic Industry Exposure Database of 10,000 properties (total insured value of \$39.01 billion) distributed across six high-hazard U.S. Gulf and Atlantic coast counties, allocated using NOAA Office for Coastal Management county-level economic indices. Physical damage is estimated via construction-class-specific log-normal vulnerability functions, and resulting ground-up losses are passed through standard insurance contract terms (deductibles and policy limits) to obtain net insured liabilities. The resulting annualized loss distribution yields insured loss thresholds of \$124,968, \$138.3 million, \$381.7 million, and \$1.87 billion at the 1-in-10, 1-in-50, 1-in-100, and 1-in-500 year return periods, respectively. We discuss the model's relationship to existing open-source and commercial catastrophe modeling platforms, the limitations introduced by its stationarity assumptions and synthetic exposure base, and the implications of a non-stationary, warming climate for long-tail insured loss estimation.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5DV48

Subjects

Computational Engineering, Earth Sciences, Engineering, Environmental Sciences, Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

Catastrophe, Risk, Hazard, Loss curve

Dates

Published: 2026-09-24 03:30

Last Updated: 2026-09-24 03:30

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Metrics

Views: 20

Downloads: 5