This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Lunar South Pole Resource Prospectivity: A Multi- Instrument Framework and a Testable Model for Heterogeneous Volatile Emplacement
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
Water ice and other volatiles in lunar south-polar permanently shadowed regions
(PSRs) are established exploration targets, but their abundance, geometry,
continuity, and depth distribution remain incompletely constrained. We present a
physically informed, AI-assisted framework integrating neutron-derived hydrogen
abundance, Diviner thermal stability, radar circular polarization ratio (CPR), and
gamma-ray geochemical context into a relative resource-prospectivity index for
85–90°S. Variables are normalized to 0–1 using physically meaningful bounds and
combined with weights prioritizing hydrogen and thermal stability. The product is
an exploration ranking, not a calibrated probability of ice. We then evaluate a
testable depositional hypothesis: “tumultuoites,” defined here as heterogeneous
volatile-bearing regolith deposits formed by rapid impact-related vapor-particle
transport, mixing, condensation, freezing, and mass movement within thermally
stable cold traps. The hypothesis predicts strong lateral and vertical variability,
including localized ice-rich lenses or aggregates embedded in lower-grade regolith and possible spatial discordance among hydrogen, thermal, and radar signatures. These predictions can be tested by rover transects, neutron prospecting, repeated shallow drilling, spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and thermal measurements. The approach reframes lunar polar resource assessment from a search for average ice abundance toward evaluation of resource geometry, heterogeneity, and extractability.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X53235
Subjects
Physical Sciences and Mathematics
Keywords
lunar, volatiles, PSR, exploration, resources, prospectivity
Dates
Published: 2026-10-06 19:20
Last Updated: 2026-10-06 19:20
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Metrics
Views: 12
Downloads: 0
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.