Skip to main content
Advances in UAV-Based Methane Emission Monitoring: Sensors, Sampling Geometry, and Quantification

Advances in UAV-Based Methane Emission Monitoring: Sensors, Sampling Geometry, and Quantification

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Nabin Bhandari, Akshansha Chauhan , Simit Raval

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are one key platforms for monitoring methane due to their flexible deployment with spatial scales between ground-based sensors and crewed aircraft This review synthesises research on UAV sensing technologies, flight and sampling strategies, quantification methods, and validation practices. It finds that quantitative performance depends on the combined choice of sensor, platform, flight geometry, wind measurement, and estimation method. The key UAV-deployable sensor categories are contrasted based on sensitivity, response, payload restrictions, and field of use, which includes open-path tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS) and closed-path TDLAS, quantum cascade laser absorption spectroscopy (QCLAS), active AirCore, non-dispersive infrared (NDIR), and thermal imaging sensors. Multirotor UAVs support repeated transects and vertical plume sampling, while fixed-wing platforms are primarily suited to broader-area screening. Mass-balance and Gaussian inversion methods can estimate emission rates, but their results are sensitive to wind uncertainty and incomplete plume coverage. Tracer-based approaches can reduce direct reliance on wind measurements when tracer and methane plumes disperse together. Controlled-release studies also show that small average bias can coexist with substantial errors in individual flights. Across sectors, methods are more developed for oil and gas facilities, landfills, and coal-mine ventilation shafts than for agriculture and wastewater. The literature reviewed identified no dedicated peer-reviewed UAV methane quantification study at an active surface coal mine. Wider use of UAVs for emissions assessment will require survey designs matched to source characteristics, stronger field validation, and more consistent uncertainty reporting.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5FF8Z

Subjects

Engineering, Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

Methane emissions, Uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs);, Plume sampling, Emission quantification, Uncertainty assessment

Dates

Published: 2026-10-30 06:47

Last Updated: 2026-10-30 06:47

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest

Data Availability:
The data will be provided on request

Metrics

Views: 36

Downloads: 2