Skip to main content
Mapping landslide change and volume with repeat airborne LiDAR after the May 2023 Emilia-Romagna event: slope-dependent detection limits and lowered areas

Mapping landslide change and volume with repeat airborne LiDAR after the May 2023 Emilia-Romagna event: slope-dependent detection limits and lowered areas

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Sansar Raj Meena 

Abstract

Landslide inventories are validated against repeat topography by comparing the ground that changes beyond a detection limit inside mapped polygons with the same fraction on stable ground. Stable ground is gentler than landslides, and LiDAR noise grows with slope. We measure the consequence for the May 2023 Emilia-Romagna event, Italy, with four pairs of 0.5 m airborne LiDAR on 919 river-corridor tiles, the only ground where pre- and post-event surveys overlap, and the 80,997-polygon RER2023 inventory. Stable ground exceeds a tile's 95th-percentile limit on 4% of flat ground and 27% of slopes above 40°, so the rate that applies to the landslides is 13.7%, not 5.9%, and the usual comparison doubles the apparent signal. A fifth pair spanning the first post-event year is consistent with the slope-matched floor in aggregate (14.5% against 14.2%, where all stable ground predicts 6.1%), although gentle and steep ground depart from it in opposite directions. With the corrected floor, 36% of mapped landslide ground changed by more than about 0.5 m. Only 20% of the mapped area of debris and earth landslides was lowered beyond the limit, mostly in the upper half of each polygon, and the same estimator finds no lowering in the post-event year. Area–volume scaling applied to the outlines overstates the measured lowering 8 to 11 times, and on the lowered area the exponent is about 1.1 to 1.3 rather than 1.45. Inventory validation needs slope-matched floors, and inventory-based volumes need lowered or source areas.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X58R5C

Subjects

Environmental Monitoring, Geomorphology, Remote Sensing

Keywords

airborne LiDAR, DEM of difference, detection limit, landslide inventory, landslide volume, area–volume scaling, Emilia-Romagna

Dates

Published: 2026-10-31 14:43

Last Updated: 2026-10-31 14:43

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None.

Metrics

Views: 12

Downloads: 1