Skip to main content
Lithologic Period Predicts Yttrium Enrichment in Western United States Stream Sediments

Lithologic Period Predicts Yttrium Enrichment in Western United States Stream Sediments

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files

Authors

Thomas Alan Woolman 

Abstract

Screening ground for heavy rare earth prospecting potential at regional scale depends upon archived geochemistry, because favorable intrusive terrain in the western U.S. greatly exceeds what any drilling program could evaluate directly. This research examined whether the lithologic period of intrusive igneous terrain can reliably predict acid-leachable yttrium using only the stream sediment draining it. The author utilized 32,221 reanalyzed NURE-HSSR samples across six western U.S. states, with lithology from the State Geologic Map Compilation and the geological period recovered from the standard geologic map symbol, since the published age field was incomplete outside Arizona. Yttrium served as the HREE precursor proxy, since the eight-coordinated xenotime site preferentially incorporates terbium through lutetium with yttrium. That premise was validated against an independent whole rock compilation, where yttrium tracks the summed heavy lanthanides at a Spearman correlation of 0.900 and the light lanthanides at 0.648. Drainage over Mesoproterozoic intrusive terrain carries a median acid-leachable yttrium concentration 2.03 times that of drainage over intrusive terrain across all other periods. A blocked permutation test, permuting the period label by 150 kilometer blocks within each state, rejected the null hypothesis at an empirical two-sided probability of 0.0246, replicating under a narrower population definition at 1.65 and 0.0359. This signal is magmatic rather than chronological, since a 2,072 sample Belt Supergroup control of comparable age demonstrates no elevation. Enrichment is not monotonic in age, because Archean terrain was the poorest period examined. The distribution peaks at approximately 1.4 Ga, refuting a possible secular mantle cooling explanation.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5RR7G

Subjects

Applied Statistics, Design of Experiments and Sample Surveys, Earth Sciences, Geochemistry, Geology, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Statistical Methodology, Statistical Models, Statistics and Probability

Keywords

heavy rare earth elements, yttrium, stream sediment geochemistry, Mesoproterozoic, ferroan granite, permutation testing, NURE-HSSR, xenotime, spatial autocorrelation, mineral exploration

Dates

Published: 2026-11-01 15:57

Last Updated: 2026-11-01 15:57

License

CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data Availability:
All data analyzed are public government releases, namely the reanalyzed NURE-HSSR stream sediment geochemistry of Smith et al. (2018), the State Geologic Map Compilation of Horton (2017), the whole rock geochemistry of USGS Data Series 942 (du Bray et al. 2015), and the USGS rare earth element occurrence inventory of Bellora et al. (2019). Each is cited in the manuscript with its DOI. No new data were generated by this study. The complete analysis code in R and Python is archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23849075 under the MIT license, with the development repository at https://github.com/twoolman/yttrium-lithologic-period.

Metrics

Views: 18

Downloads: 2