Skip to main content
Repeatability-dependent detection thresholds for time-lapse seismic CO₂ monitoring

Repeatability-dependent detection thresholds for time-lapse seismic CO₂ monitoring

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Moses Olanrewaju Falowo 

Abstract

We quantify the smallest CO₂ layer that a time-lapse seismic survey pair can detect as a function of repeatability, measured by the normalized root-mean-square (NRMS) difference, in a controlled, Sleipner-like synthetic study. Gassmann fluid substitution under four fluid-mixing treatments feeds one-dimensional layer models, checked against two-dimensional finite-difference gathers, and calibrated nonrepeatability sets NRMS from 10% to 60%. Detection is a hypothesis test at a false-alarm probability of 0.05, with 1200 null realizations for each frequency and noise level and 40 held-out signal realizations in each of 1728 cells, for four detectors: windowed energy, a clean-template matched filter, a generic-template filter, and a small convolutional neural network (CNN). At 30 Hz, a CO₂ saturation of 0.8, and uniform (Reuss) mixing, the energy detector's minimum detectable thickness rises from the 1-m grid floor at NRMS 10% to 4.5 m at NRMS 60%, and Voigt mixing roughly doubles the latter. The energy detector's minimum detectable free-phase mass per area rises over the same NRMS range from 25 (a censored grid corner) to 253 kg/m², both at the lowest saturation tested. At 30 and 45 Hz and NRMS of 40% and above, the energy detector and the CNN increasingly exceed the matched filter's area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, consistent with nonrepeatability misaligning the signal; at 15 Hz the matched filter keeps its advantage. At fixed NRMS, in-window reflectivity and host stiffness also move the 30-Hz energy-detector threshold, and a consolidated host suppresses detection. Predictions agree with 11 published Sleipner observables within a factor of 1.41, a consistency check rather than validation. Published Sleipner NRMS of 45%–53% lies near the 50% grid level, where energy-detector, matched-filter, and CNN thresholds span 1.8–3.0 m. A credible detection claim therefore states the repeatability, the false-alarm probability, and the detector together.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5QR6S

Subjects

Geophysics and Seismology

Keywords

time-lapse seismic, CO₂ storage monitoring, detectability, repeatability, NRMS, rock physics, signal detection, Sleipner

Dates

Published: 2026-11-03 14:57

Last Updated: 2026-11-03 14:57

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data Availability:
This study is fully synthetic: no proprietary or field datasets were used. Field information enters only through published Sleipner values cited in the text. The code that generates every result and figure is available from the author on request.

Metrics

Views: 11

Downloads: 1