This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Supplementary Files
Authors
Abstract
Uncovering key actors within a policy network provides pathways for engagement, consensus-building, partnership development, and understanding the diffusion of knowledge in a given debate. Given the unprecedented scale of the climate emergency, the emerging field of climate security has rapidly gained centrality in academic and policy fora, as well as in the public debate. Yet, a systematic analysis of the main actors engaged in this space is missing. This study draws from digital methods and network analysis techniques to employ a method for identifying relevant actors, focusing on Twitter (now X) from 2014 to 2022, with the objective of spotting the major actors driving public discussions around climate security. The research also demonstrates how institutions can position themselves within such issue networks through a case study of the Consultative Group on International Agriculture Research (CGIAR), a global research-for-development organization that has recently positioned itself in the climate security community. Results reveal that the climate security debate on social media is predominantly institutional, with research bodies and international organizations as central elements. While CGIAR is a relatively new actor, it is already centrally located in the network, maintaining strong connections with other major players, which places it in a strategic position to enhance its influence and reach. Understanding this discursive landscape is crucial for identifying opportunities for effective engagement, partnership, and positioning in such an increasingly salient field of research and practice.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5HX4W
Subjects
International and Area Studies
Keywords
Climate security, actor mapping, social network analysis, visual network analysis, social media, Digital methods
Dates
Published: 2024-09-27 18:39
Last Updated: 2024-09-28 01:39
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Data Availability (Reason not available):
Processed data available upon request. Raw and annotated Twitter data is available in the following data paper: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.110628
Conflict of interest statement:
Authors declare no competing interests.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.