Article Instance
API Endpoint for journals.
GET /api/articles/26120/?format=api
{ "pk": 26120, "title": "Determining the alternatives for scalar implicature", "subtitle": null, "abstract": "Successful communication regularly requires listeners to makepragmatic inferences — enrichments beyond the literal mean-ing of a speaker’s utterance. For example, when interpretinga sentence such as “Alice ate some of the cookies,” listenersroutinely infer that Alice did not eat all of them. A Griceanaccount of this phenomenon assumes the presence of alterna-tives (like “all of the cookies”) with varying degrees of infor-mativity, but it remains an open question precisely what thesealternatives are. To address this question, we collect empiricalmeasurements of speaker and listener judgments about vary-ing sets of alternatives across a range of scales and use these asinputs to a computational model of pragmatic inference. Thisapproach allows us to test hypotheses about how well differ-ent sets of alternatives predict pragmatic judgments by peo-ple. Our findings suggest that comprehenders likely considera broader set of alternatives beyond those logically entailed bythe initial message.", "language": "eng", "license": { "name": "", "short_name": "", "text": null, "url": "" }, "keywords": [], "section": "Papers", "is_remote": true, "remote_url": "https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2vj6q5r5", "frozenauthors": [ { "first_name": "Benjamin", "middle_name": "", "last_name": "Peloquin", "name_suffix": "", "institution": "Stanford University", "department": "" }, { "first_name": "Michael", "middle_name": "C.", "last_name": "Frank", "name_suffix": "", "institution": "Stanford University", "department": "" } ], "date_submitted": null, "date_accepted": null, "date_published": "2016-01-01T18:00:00Z", "render_galley": null, "galleys": [ { "label": "PDF", "type": "pdf", "path": "https://journalpub.escholarship.org/cognitivesciencesociety/article/26120/galley/15756/download/" } ] }