Article Instance
API Endpoint for journals.
GET /api/articles/27070/?format=api
{ "pk": 27070, "title": "Legal HARKing: theoretical grounding in interaction research", "subtitle": null, "abstract": "In psychology, we tend to follow the general logic of fal-sificationism: we separate the ‘context of discovery’ (howwe come up with theories) from the ‘context of justification’(how we test them). However, when studying human interac-tion, separating these contexts can lead to theories with lowecological validity that do not generalize well to life outsidethe lab. We propose borrowing research practices from for-mal inductive methodologies during the process of discover-ing new regularities and analyzing natural data without beingled by theory. From the perspective of experimental psychol-ogy, this approach may appear similar to the ‘questionable re-search practice’ of HARKing (Hypothesizing After The Re-sults are Known). We argue that a carefully constructed formof HARKing can be used systematically and transparently dur-ing exploratory research and can lead to more robust and eco-logically valid theories.", "language": "eng", "license": { "name": "", "short_name": "", "text": null, "url": "" }, "keywords": [ { "word": "HARKing; experimentalpsychology; conversation analysis; methodology; interaction" } ], "section": "Posters: Papers", "is_remote": true, "remote_url": "https://escholarship.org/uc/item/11c3q50g", "frozenauthors": [ { "first_name": "Saul", "middle_name": "", "last_name": "Albert", "name_suffix": "", "institution": "Tufts University", "department": "" }, { "first_name": "J.P.", "middle_name": "", "last_name": "de Ruiter", "name_suffix": "", "institution": "Tufts University", "department": "" } ], "date_submitted": null, "date_accepted": null, "date_published": "2017-01-01T18:00:00Z", "render_galley": null, "galleys": [ { "label": "PDF", "type": "pdf", "path": "https://journalpub.escholarship.org/cognitivesciencesociety/article/27070/galley/16706/download/" } ] }