Article Instance
API Endpoint for journals.
GET /api/articles/27883/?format=api
{ "pk": 27883, "title": "Emotion as a Form of Perception: Why William James was not a Jamesian", "subtitle": null, "abstract": "Two main views have informed the literature on the psy-chology of emotion in the past few decades. On one side,cognitivists identify emotions with processes such as judg-ments, evaluations and appraisals. On the other side, advo-cates of non-cognitive approaches leave the “intellectual” as-pects of emotional experience out of the emotion itself, in-stead identifying emotions with embodied processes involv-ing physiological changes. Virtually everyone on either sideof the cognitive/non-cognitive divide identify William James’view, also known as the James-Lange theory, fully on the non-cognitivist side. But this is a mistake. Re-interpreting James’writings in its scientific context, this paper argues that he actu-ally rejected the cognitive/non-cognitive divide, such that hisview of emotions did not fit either side—that is, James was nota “Jamesian” in the sense the term is used in the literature.", "language": "eng", "license": { "name": "", "short_name": "", "text": null, "url": "" }, "keywords": [ { "word": "Emotion" }, { "word": "cognitivism" }, { "word": "James-Lange theory" }, { "word": "perception" }, { "word": "Sensation" }, { "word": "physiological changes" } ], "section": "Publication-based-Talks", "is_remote": true, "remote_url": "https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2kn6g303", "frozenauthors": [ { "first_name": "Guilherme", "middle_name": "", "last_name": "Sanches de Oliveira", "name_suffix": "", "institution": "U of Cincinnati", "department": "" } ], "date_submitted": null, "date_accepted": null, "date_published": "2018-01-01T18:00:00Z", "render_galley": null, "galleys": [ { "label": "PDF", "type": "pdf", "path": "https://journalpub.escholarship.org/cognitivesciencesociety/article/27883/galley/17521/download/" } ] }