Article Instance
API Endpoint for journals.
GET /api/articles/28137/?format=api
{ "pk": 28137, "title": "Over-representation of Extreme Events in Decision-Making: A Rational Metacognitive Account", "subtitle": null, "abstract": "The Availability bias, manifested in the over-representation ofextreme eventualities, is a well-known cognitive bias, and isgenerally taken as evidence of human irrationality. In thiswork, we present the first rational, metacognitive account ofthe Availability bias, formally articulated at Marr’s algorith-mic level of analysis. Concretely, we present a normative,metacognitive model of how a cognitive system should over-represent extreme eventualities, depending on the amount oftime available for decision-making. Our Sample-based Ex-pected Utility model also accounts for two well-known fram-ing effects in human decision-making under risk—the fourfoldpattern of risk preferences in outcome probability (Tversky& Kahneman, 1992) and in outcome magnitude (Markovitz,1952)—thereby providing the first metacognitively-rationalbasis for the aforementioned effects. Empirical evidence con-firms an important prediction of our model. Surprisingly, ourmodel is strikingly robust with respect to its focal parameter.We discuss the implications of our work for studies on hu-man decision-making, and conclude by presenting a counter-intuitive prediction of our model, which, if confirmed, wouldhave intriguing implications for human decision-making un-der risk. To our knowledge, our model is the first metacog-nitive, resource-rational process model of cognitive biases indecision-making. Notably, our work also contributes to thefields of artificial intelligence and computational statistics, bypresenting a previously unknown proposal distribution, withfirm rational grounds, broadly applicable to the influential sub-field of importance sampling Monte Carlo methods.", "language": "eng", "license": { "name": "", "short_name": "", "text": null, "url": "" }, "keywords": [ { "word": "Availability bias; Decision-making under uncer-tainty and risk; Metacognitively rational models; Fourfold pat-tern of risk preferences" } ], "section": "Publication-based-Talks", "is_remote": true, "remote_url": "https://escholarship.org/uc/item/85p7246k", "frozenauthors": [ { "first_name": "Ardavan", "middle_name": "S", "last_name": "Nobandegani", "name_suffix": "", "institution": "McGill", "department": "" }, { "first_name": "Kevin", "middle_name": "da Silva", "last_name": "Castanheira", "name_suffix": "", "institution": "McGill", "department": "" }, { "first_name": "A. Ross", "middle_name": "", "last_name": "Otto", "name_suffix": "", "institution": "McGill", "department": "" }, { "first_name": "Thomas", "middle_name": "R", "last_name": "Schultz", "name_suffix": "", "institution": "McGill", "department": "" } ], "date_submitted": null, "date_accepted": null, "date_published": "2018-01-01T18:00:00Z", "render_galley": null, "galleys": [ { "label": "PDF", "type": "pdf", "path": "https://journalpub.escholarship.org/cognitivesciencesociety/article/28137/galley/17796/download/" } ] }