Article Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "pk": 28867,
    "title": "Not All Exceptions Are the Same: Different Memory Demands for Differentiation,\nIsolation and Odd-ball Exceptions",
    "subtitle": null,
    "abstract": "There is an influential body of research arguing that category\nexceptions have a special status in memory compared to\nregular category members. However, the memory advantage\nfor category exceptions has typically been demonstrated using\none very specific category structure (Differentiation). Here we\npresent a study examining whether the reported memory\nadvantage is specific to this particular structure or whether it\ncan be generalized to other kinds of exceptions (Isolation and\nOdd-ball). We compare three different types of category\nexceptions that have varying memory demands due to\ndifferent levels of feature binding required for accurate\ncategorization. The results suggest that only those exceptions\nthat require binding together multiple features are\nremembered better than regular, rule-following items. The\npresent work clarifies that the memory advantage for\nexceptions characterizes certain kinds of exceptions rather\nthan exceptions in general.",
    "language": "eng",
    "license": {
        "name": "",
        "short_name": "",
        "text": null,
        "url": ""
    },
    "keywords": [
        {
            "word": "category exceptions; rule-plus-exception; binding\nrequirement"
        }
    ],
    "section": "Papers with Poster Presentations",
    "is_remote": true,
    "remote_url": "https://escholarship.org/uc/item/56n4273f",
    "frozenauthors": [],
    "date_submitted": null,
    "date_accepted": null,
    "date_published": "2019-01-01T18:00:00Z",
    "render_galley": null,
    "galleys": [
        {
            "label": "PDF",
            "type": "pdf",
            "path": "https://journalpub.escholarship.org/cognitivesciencesociety/article/28867/galley/18738/download/"
        }
    ]
}