Article Instance
API Endpoint for journals.
GET /api/articles/50434/?format=api
{ "pk": 50434, "title": "What Perceptrons Might Tell Us About Our Own Abilities", "subtitle": null, "abstract": "Minsky and Papert's (1969) book *Perceptrons* is often remembered as the book that (counter-productively) ended neural network research for nearly two decades. One of the authors' main results was that perceptrons (under reasonable limitations) cannot detect if a pattern is fully connected. Perhaps less known, to their initial surprise, the authors also showed that if guaranteed there are no holes in an image, perceptrons *can* detect if a pattern is fully connected. Given the simplicity of perceptrons, it seems reasonable to think that they might suggest a lower bound for what humans can visually detect without moving their eyes. If so, the results on connectedness suggest some counter-intuitive findings about human perception, namely that we should be able to learn to solve 2D mazes at a glance and detect how many objects are in an image at a glance (i.e., subitize) even when the number is large.", "language": "eng", "license": { "name": "", "short_name": "", "text": null, "url": "" }, "keywords": [ { "word": "Artificial Intelligence; Psychology; Learning; Perception; Neural Networks" } ], "section": "Member Abstracts with Poster Presentation", "is_remote": true, "remote_url": "https://escholarship.org/uc/item/65t946bw", "frozenauthors": [ { "first_name": "Shayan", "middle_name": "", "last_name": "Doroudi", "name_suffix": "", "institution": "University of California, Irvine", "department": "" } ], "date_submitted": null, "date_accepted": null, "date_published": "2025-01-01T10:00:00-08:00", "render_galley": null, "galleys": [ { "label": "PDF", "type": "pdf", "path": "https://journalpub.escholarship.org/cognitivesciencesociety/article/50434/galley/38396/download/" } ] }