Article Instance
API Endpoint for journals.
GET /api/articles/26954/?format=api
{ "pk": 26954, "title": "Modeling the Ellsberg Paradox by Argument Strength", "subtitle": null, "abstract": "We present a formal measure of argument strength, whichcombines the ideas that conclusions of strong arguments are (i)highly probable and (ii) their uncertainty is relatively precise.Likewise, arguments are weak when their conclusion proba-bility is low or when it is highly imprecise. We show howthe proposed measure provides a new model of the Ellsbergparadox. Moreover, we further substantiate the psychologi-cal plausibility of our approach by an experiment (N = 60).The data show that the proposed measure predicts human in-ferences in the original Ellsberg task and in corresponding ar-gument strength tasks. Finally, we report qualitative data takenfrom structured interviews on folk psychological conceptionson what argument strength means.", "language": "eng", "license": { "name": "", "short_name": "", "text": null, "url": "" }, "keywords": [ { "word": "argument strength; coherence; Ellsberg paradox;probability logic" } ], "section": "Talks: Papers", "is_remote": true, "remote_url": "https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3vm8r4ft", "frozenauthors": [ { "first_name": "Niki", "middle_name": "", "last_name": "Pfeifer", "name_suffix": "", "institution": "Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich", "department": "" }, { "first_name": "Hanna", "middle_name": "", "last_name": "Pankka", "name_suffix": "", "institution": "University of Helsinki", "department": "" } ], "date_submitted": null, "date_accepted": null, "date_published": "2017-01-01T10:00:00-08:00", "render_galley": null, "galleys": [ { "label": "PDF", "type": "pdf", "path": "https://journalpub.escholarship.org/cognitivesciencesociety/article/26954/galley/16590/download/" } ] }