Article Instance
API Endpoint for journals.
GET /api/articles/28850/?format=api
{ "pk": 28850, "title": "Outcomes Speak Louder than Actions?\nTesting a Challenge to the Two-Process Model of Moral Judgment", "subtitle": null, "abstract": "Curiously, people assign less punishment to a person who\nattempts and fails to harm somebody if their intended victim\nhappens to suffer the harm for coincidental reasons. This\n“blame blocking” effect provides an important evidence in\nsupport of the two-process model of moral judgment\n(Cushman, 2008). Yet, recent proposals suggest that it might\nbe due to an unintended interpretation of the dependent\nmeasure in cases of coincidental harm (Prochownik, 2017; also\nMalle, Guglielmo, & Monroe, 2014). If so, this would deprive\nthe two-process model of an important source of empirical\nsupport. We report and discuss results that speak against this\nalternative account.", "language": "eng", "license": { "name": "", "short_name": "", "text": null, "url": "" }, "keywords": [ { "word": "blame blocking; two-process model; punishment;\noutcomes; actions; pragmatics" } ], "section": "Papers with Poster Presentations", "is_remote": true, "remote_url": "https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8mq6491t", "frozenauthors": [ { "first_name": "Karolina", "middle_name": "", "last_name": "Prochownik", "name_suffix": "", "institution": "Ruhr University Bochum", "department": "" }, { "first_name": "Fiery", "middle_name": "A.", "last_name": "Cushman", "name_suffix": "", "institution": "Harvard University", "department": "" } ], "date_submitted": null, "date_accepted": null, "date_published": "2019-01-01T18:00:00Z", "render_galley": null, "galleys": [ { "label": "PDF", "type": "pdf", "path": "https://journalpub.escholarship.org/cognitivesciencesociety/article/28850/galley/18721/download/" } ] }