Skip to main content
Testing the accuracy and transferability of remotely sensed biomass models across heterogeneous grasslands

Testing the accuracy and transferability of remotely sensed biomass models across heterogeneous grasslands

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2026.115294. This is version 3 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Jan M. Schweizer , Leon T Hauser, Hamed Gholizadeh, Anna K. Schweiger, Christian Rossi

Abstract

Grassland aboveground biomass provides key insights into ecological processes such as carbon sequestration, animal movement patterns, and agricultural management practices. Different model types have been developed to estimate grassland biomass from satellite imagery. However, differences in model performance across sites with varying management and ecology remain largely understudied. In this study, we compared accuracy and transferability of empirical, physically-based, and hybrid models to estimate grassland biomass from multispectral Sentinel-2 data in an agnostic scenario, i.e., the models were not provided with any site-specific information beyond the spectral data. Based on field data from five study sites in Europe and the United States, we assessed (1)site-level accuracy of biomass estimation models, (2) model transferability between sites (domain shift), (3) the performance of models trained or optimized with data from multiple study sites (domain generalization), and (4) the relationship between epistemic uncertainty and model transferability. Our results showed that (1) all models exhibited comparable performance at the site level, (2) physically-based models showed the highest degree of transferability between sites, (3) no model consistently outperformed all other models when trained or optimized with field data from multiple sites, and (4) epistemic uncertainty was not necessarily a reliable measure of model applicability to unseen data. Our findings demonstrate the challenges associated with grassland biomass models under domain shift. This elucidates limits to agnostic inference in targeting diverse grasslands and highlights that model transferability is an integral part of performance assessment towards scalable satellite-based grassland monitoring systems, especially as the community increasingly deploys models at continental to global scales.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5874T

Subjects

Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

Gaussian process regression, PROSAIL, LUT inversion, sentinel-2, active learning, Hybrid retrieval, physically-based models, Empirical models, Model comparison

Dates

Published: 2025-08-28 17:43

Last Updated: 2026-02-09 14:49

Older Versions

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data Availability (Reason not available):
Available upon request

Metrics

Views: 929

Downloads: 443