This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Economic and Environmental Comparison of Open Field and Screenhouse Vegetable Farming in Nigeria
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
This study compares screenhouse, rainfed, and irrigated vegetable farming systems in Northwest Nigeria, focusing on their economic and environmental performance. Screenhouse farming demonstrates superior yield, cost-efficiency, and sustainability, producing up to 90% more saleable output than rainfed systems and using over 95% less water per kilogram of produce. Although initial investment is higher over 600% more than rainfed farming screenhouse systems emit less than 5% of the greenhouse gases associated with conventional open-field production. Rainfed farming, while low-cost, suffers from poor resource efficiency and low productivity. Irrigated systems offer moisture stability but require substantial water and energy inputs. These findings highlight the potential of screenhouse farming and the importance of adopting sustainable irrigation strategies such as drip systems, fertigation, and rainwater harvesting to enhance long-term resilience and efficiency in vegetable production.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5XN0B
Subjects
Agriculture
Keywords
Screenhouse Farming, Open Field Farming, Economic Efficiency, environmental impact, Green House Gas Emissions, Vegetable Production, Northwest Nigeria
Dates
Published: 2025-09-12 12:09
Last Updated: 2025-09-12 12:09
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Data Availability (Reason not available):
Thank you for the reminder regarding data transparency.
We confirm that our submission includes the minimal data set required to replicate all study findings, in accordance with PLOS guidelines. This includes:
- Raw data used in the analysis
- Metadata describing the variables and data collection procedures
- Detailed methods outlining the analytical framework and statistical techniques applied
All relevant datasets and supporting documentation have been made available either within the manuscript, as supplementary files, or through the designated data repository, ensuring full reproducibility of the study.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.