Skip to main content
Crystalline silica content of natural, engineered, and synthetic stone products and their relation to silicosis policy development

Crystalline silica content of natural, engineered, and synthetic stone products and their relation to silicosis policy development

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Dominique Tanner, Lloyd White, David Noi, Vinod Gopaldasani

Abstract

Crystalline silica minerals – quartz, cristobalite, and tridymite – are hazardous when inhaled. They are at least an order of magnitude more toxic than crystalline silica-free inert mineral dusts. Workplace exposure to hazardous levels of crystalline silica is entirely preventable, yet accelerated silicosis is emerging in developed countries, from the fabrication of crystalline silica-rich natural and synthetic stone materials (including engineered stone). The Australian government responded to this crisis through legislation to first limit, and then later ban crystalline silica in engineered stone, while other governments have focused their efforts on workplace monitoring and enforcing safety regulations. To approach this issue sensibly, policymakers must know the range of crystalline silica in natural rocks, engineered stone and other synthetic stone products such as porcelain – since these materials typically contain >1 vol.% crystalline silica and are commonly fabricated by stonemasons. Workers in other industries, such as mining, tunnelling, and construction are also routinely exposed to dust containing crystalline silica from natural rocks and concrete. Here, we review and compare the crystalline silica contents of natural rocks and synthetic stone products to demonstrate the efficacy of limits on the amount of crystalline silica in products (“thresholds”) relative to other dust control measures. We review molecular-scale determinants of silica toxicity and suggest that the fabrication of alternative, and newer generations of engineered stone products may also pose a significant health risk.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X59T8H

Subjects

Earth Sciences, Geochemistry, Geology, Materials Science and Engineering, Public Health

Keywords

silicosis, dust, fabrication, lung disease, rock, dimension stone

Dates

Published: 2025-11-13 03:45

Last Updated: 2025-11-13 03:45

Older Versions

License

CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data Availability (Reason not available):
Supporting data to be made available on publication