This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
Computation to Choose a Future: Planetary Stewardship in the Age of AI
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
The accelerating transformations of the Anthropocene demand governance systems capable of anticipating and steering complex, nonlinear Earth-system dynamics. Existing models optimize for likely trajectories rather than exploring a broader set of futures. This commentary introduces the concept of Computational Foresight (CF): an integrative framework combining artificial intelligence, simulation, and complex-systems modeling to augment human anticipation and collective reasoning about the future. CF organizes foresight into five interlinked functions forming a continuous, reflexive cycle for anticipatory governance. It draws on advances in machine learning, reinforcement learning, causal inference, and generative modeling to detect emerging signals, map feedbacks, and test “what if” interventions within virtual environments. CF thus shifts computation from prediction to possibility mapping, treating uncertainty as a resource for learning. The paper outlines the key technical and ethical frontiers of this transition: validation under deep uncertainty, reasoning in open-ended domains, alignment with human values, prevention of algorithmic closure, pluralistic model integration, and genuine human–AI collaboration. CF is proposed as a new layer of civic and scientific infrastructure for Earth system stewardship, aiming to enable societies not merely to forecast the future but to co-design it through transparent, participatory, and adaptive intelligence.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5M170
Subjects
Engineering, Physical Sciences and Mathematics
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence, foresight, future design, earth system governance, machine learning, integrated assessment, anticipatory governance, Planetary Stewardship
Dates
Published: 2025-11-26 09:18
Last Updated: 2025-11-26 09:18
Older Versions
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Data Availability (Reason not available):
This commentary proposes frameworks for future research and does not present original code or data.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.