Skip to main content
An assessment of the quality of microanalysis of silicate glass using scanning electron microscope-based energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM-EDS)

An assessment of the quality of microanalysis of silicate glass using scanning electron microscope-based energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM-EDS)

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Guilherme Augusto Rosa Gualda , Alessandro Frontoni, Blake M Wallrich, Lydia Harmon , Sarah Lynette Smithies , Genna Raine Chiaro , Ayla S Pamukçu

Abstract

The composition of volcanic glass records important clues into the origin and evolution of magmatic systems. However, the analysis of volcanic glass presents challenges when performed using electron-beam techniques, particularly due to Na mobility. While microanalysis of geological materials is usually performed using electron microprobe-based wavelength-dispersive spectrometry (EMP-WDS), we present here results of glass analysis using energy-dispersive spectrometry with a scanning electron microscope (SEM- EDS). We use three U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) whole-rock reference materials (i.e., RGM-1, STM-1, QLO-1) that were fused into glass using a double-fusion technique. Results for 12 sessions over two months using the SEM-EDS reveal excellent reproducibility, agreement with the expected values for RGM-1 and STM-1, and excellent counting statistics when using live acquisition times of 15 s; results for QLO-1 suggest that the fused material is somewhat inhomogeneous. For longer acquisition times (30, 60, 90 s), significant Na migration is observed; we conclude that minimal Na migration takes place with acquisition times of 15 s using our analytical instrumentation. We also compile data for RGM-1 obtained using the same instrument over the last decade, and we further demonstrate the reliability of SEM-EDS for microanalysis of silicate glasses. Comparison of our results with EMP-WDS results for a range of reference materials published by researchers at the USGS Alaska Volcano Observatory suggest that both EMP-WDS and SEM-EDS can yield adequate analysis of volcanic glass, but SEM-EDS can potentially lead to higher precision for major elements (1 wt.% concentration), while EMP-WDS typically leads to higher precision for minor elements. The higher precision of SEM-EDS results for major elements, combined with the more widespread distribution, lower usage cost, and higher ease of use of such systems, makes analysis via SEM-EDS an attractive option for measuring major-element compositions of volcanic glass.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5KT80

Subjects

Earth Sciences

Keywords

volcanic glass, electron-based microanalysis, energy-dispersive spectrometry, scanning electron microscope, wavelength-dispersive spectrometry, electron microprobe

Dates

Published: 2025-12-04 14:28

Last Updated: 2025-12-04 14:28

License

CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International