Skip to main content
Assessing the riverine flood forecast skill of GloFAS and Google Flood Hub with impact data and discharge observations to support early actions in Mali

Assessing the riverine flood forecast skill of GloFAS and Google Flood Hub with impact data and discharge observations to support early actions in Mali

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Els Kuipers, Valentijn Oldenburg, Phuoc Phung, Edwin Sutanudjaja, Andrea Ficchi, Peter Salamon, Marc van den Homberg

Abstract

Riverine floods are among the most destructive and frequent natural hazards in Mali. To reduce their impacts, the Mali Red Cross implemented an Early Action Protocol (EAP) to enable anticipatory actions through pre-defined triggers and forecast information. Currently, the protocol relies on upstream water levels from the National Directorate of Hydraulics (DNH) to predict downstream flooding. However, this model does not consider meteorological forcing, limiting lead times to a maximum of four days. Recent advancements in global flood forecasting systems present opportunities to enhance Mali's EAP by leveraging increasingly skilful medium-range weather forecasts as inputs of both physics-based models, as in the Global Flood Awareness System (GloFAS), and AI-based models, as in Google Flood Hub (GFH). We compare GloFAS v4.0 and v3.0, GFH, and Mali’s current trigger model using discharge observations and district-level impact data derived from multiple sources and text-mined news-articles. Model performance was assessed for a range of lead times and discharge thresholds. GloFAS and GFH demonstrate sufficient skill for early action beyond 4-day lead time in frequently flooded regions and have a larger spatial coverage compared to the current trigger model, suggesting early action plans could operate with 7-day lead time and span a larger area. Overall, this study highlights the potential and challenges of flood forecasting for anticipatory action in flood-prone, data-scarce regions. In particular, we (i) assess the usability of two different ground truths (observed discharge and impact data) for forecast validation; (ii) assess the possibility of extending Mali’s current trigger model in lead time and spatial coverage; and (iii) evaluate user-oriented forecast skill across models and contexts.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5476B

Subjects

Environmental Health and Protection, Water Resource Management

Keywords

riverine floods, anticipatory action, trigger model, impact-based forecasting, forecast verification, GloFAS, Google Flood Hub, anticipatory action, trigger model, impact-based forecasting, Forecast verification, GloFAS, Google Flood Hub

Dates

Published: 2026-01-07 18:43

Last Updated: 2026-01-07 18:43

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data Availability (Reason not available):
The river flow observations in Mali are available for this study under a special non-disclosure agreement with the Direction Nationale de l'Hydraulique (DNH-Mali) via the Croix-Rouge Malienne, and are not publicly accessible over the period used in the study. Researchers can request access to DNH-Mali

Metrics

Views: 152

Downloads: 22