U–Pb dating of mineral deposits: From age constraints to ore-forming processes

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files
Authors

Cyril Chelle-Michou , Urs Schaltegger

Abstract

The knowledge of the timing and duration of ore-forming processes are perhaps one of the most desirable pieces of information that geologists require to draw a complete picture of the deposit and to put its genesis into a coherent regional or even global geological framework. In many cases, it represents an essential parameter for establishing detailed genetic models, and can critically impact on exploration strategies. This necessarily requires a reliable, precise and accurate geochronometer. This chapter reviews the basics of the U–Pb geochronology and the most commonly used dating techniques and minerals while pointing out their respective advantages, weaknesses and potential pitfalls. Through a series of case studies, we illustrate the various usages of U–Pb dating for the study of mineral deposits. Admittedly, U–Pb geochronology is a field that is strongly biased toward the use of zircon and this chapter is not an exception. Nevertheless, we will also shed light on U–Pb dating applied to less commonly encountered and dated minerals.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/osf.io/b7pw9

Subjects

Earth Sciences, Geochemistry, Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

U-Pb dating, Geochronology, mineral deposits

Dates

Published: 2018-10-12 10:32

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International