Skip to main content
Declining Snowpack in the Presence of Stable Precipitation May Not Negatively Impact Baseflow or Floodplain Vegetation in the Middle Fork Rock Creek Watershed, Montana, USA

Declining Snowpack in the Presence of Stable Precipitation May Not Negatively Impact Baseflow or Floodplain Vegetation in the Middle Fork Rock Creek Watershed, Montana, USA

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Emily Iskin, Anna Bergstrom, Jodi Brandt

Abstract

In the age of snow droughts and megafires, water availability and changes in precipitation, snowpack, and baseflows are active areas of research. Headwater streams are where all large rivers begin, but their seasonal water availability is difficult to measure because they are so abundant and remote. Remote sensing can help monitor small streams semi-arid areas if there is an appropriate proxy for water availability given the coarse spatial resolution of satellite data. In this study, 40 water years (1984-2024) of climate, streamflow, and floodplain vegetation data are compiled in the relatively undisturbed and gaged Middle Fork Rock Creek watershed in Montana to investigate if and how climate, streamflow, and vegetation are changing through time and/or are correlated with each other. We find that temperatures are warming, snowpacks are shrinking, and total flow volume is growing, but total precipitation, late season baseflow volume, and floodplain vegetation remain stable. In a given water year, greater coverage of floodplain vegetation in September is correlated with more precipitation and higher late season baseflow volume, indicating that the stream and the vegetation might not be in direct competition for available water. Additionally, floodplain vegetation measured with remote sensing is likely an appropriate proxy for late season baseflow in this watershed and could potentially be used to monitor ungaged watersheds. More study is needed to determine if floodplain vegetation is an appropriate proxy for water availability generally across the semi-arid U.S.,; and how these relationships between climate, streamflow, and vegetation might vary across watersheds of varying size, topography, and ecoregion.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5BV1H

Subjects

Earth Sciences, Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Sciences, Hydrology, Natural Resources and Conservation

Keywords

water availability, hydrology, vegetation, precipitation, baseflow, Montana, MRRMaid

Dates

Published: 2026-02-28 01:09

Last Updated: 2026-02-28 01:09

License

CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
This work was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) [grant numbers 80NSSC25K7236, 80NSSC21K1624] and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) [grant number 2022-11619].

Data Availability:
The floodplain vegetation data used in the study are publicly available from the MVPRestore Google Earth Engine app that is linked on this homepage: https://www.boisestate.edu/hes/projects/mrrmaid-mesic-resource-restoration-monitoring-aid/. The climate data are available from the Climate Engine App via https://app.climateengine.org/, and the discharge data are available from the U.S. Geological Survey’s Water Data for the Nation website via https://waterdata.usgs.gov/. The elevation data can be accessed through The National Map downloader tool via https://apps.nationalmap.gov/downloader/ and the VBET data are available from the Riverscapes Data Exchange via https://data.riverscapes.net/. Shapefiles of the delineated watershed and floodplain reaches will be shared upon request.

Metrics

Views: 14

Downloads: 1