Skip to main content
Mutual interactions between aquifer thermal energy storage and groundwater extraction: global sensitivity insights

Mutual interactions between aquifer thermal energy storage and groundwater extraction: global sensitivity insights

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Zerui Mi, Luka Tas , Wouter Deleersnyder, Thomas Hermans 

Abstract

Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage (ATES) is increasingly deployed in groundwater protection zones, motivating a quantitative assessment of thermal impacts on public-supply wells and the influence of supply-well pumping on ATES performance. In the Campine Basin (Belgium), we simulate three settings: balanced operation, seasonal imbalance, and multi-system deployment. Using a groundwater flow and heat-transport model. Uncertainty in hydrogeological properties and operational settings is represented with Latin Hypercube sampling, and distance-based Generalized Sensitivity Analysis (DGSA) ranks parameter sensitivity for both supply-well temperature disturbance (ΔTsupply) and ATES recovery efficiency. Supply-well ΔTsupply decreases with distance but can exceed natural seasonal variability at close spacing, particularly under imbalance and dense layouts. In the near field (≤75 m), range ΔTsupply is mainly controlled by ATES throughput and seasonal imbalance under pumping-induced convection from ATES cycling superimposed on continuous supply-well abstraction. At larger distances (≥200 m), variability is governed primarily by conductivity contrasts, porosity, and dispersivity, together with regional flow and the supply-well induced hydraulic gradient. Strong background flow and short spacing reduce recovery efficiency, and multi-system cases show cumulative plume interference. For the Campine Basin and similar hydrogeological settings, the results support site-specific setback design, operational constraints, and monitoring requirements, and the same workflow can be applied to other aquifers to derive locally appropriate permitting guidance.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5718Z

Subjects

Hydrology

Keywords

Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage (ATES); groundwater protection; thermal recovery efficiency; sensitivity analysis

Dates

Published: 2026-02-28 05:12

Last Updated: 2026-02-28 05:12

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Metrics

Views: 18

Downloads: 1