Skip to main content
Automated Levee Detection in Digital Elevation Models

Automated Levee Detection in Digital Elevation Models

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Maarten Pronk, Matthijs Gawehn, Marieke Eleveld, Hugo Ledoux

Abstract

Current flood risk models applied at national and global scales do not---or only partially---take levees into account, resulting in inaccurate flood inundation maps.
While levees are important assets in natural hazard risk assessments, accurate information in the public domain about the location and height of these embankments is often missing.
Remote sensing data---such as global digital elevation models (DEMs)---contain this information, in theory.
However, their low resolution and vertical biases (caused by the canopy and infrastructure) complicate the extraction of levees.
We present a new DEM processing method to identify and extract levees from any high-resolution DEM as continuous features, including related attributes such as the protected area and volume.
As a test case, we use CopernicusDEM GLO-30 and local DEMs.
Validation against reference data from the United States and the Netherlands yields a recall of up to 88% on a local DEM and up to 51% when applied to the 30 m resolution global DSM.
The method also identifies other water-retaining barriers such as undocumented dams.
Incorporating levees derived from these methods into flood risk models should enable practitioners to construct more accurate (coastal) flood inundation maps on national and global scales.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X57X8X

Subjects

Geomorphology

Keywords

embankment, levee, CopernicusDEM, mathematical morphology, terrain processing, flood risk

Dates

Published: 2026-03-04 22:10

Last Updated: 2026-03-04 22:10

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data Availability:
Yes

Metrics

Views: 58

Downloads: 3