Skip to main content
Seismological models based on a hybrid deep-learning strategy reveal tectonic features and earthquake risk in the Sichuan-Yunnan region

Seismological models based on a hybrid deep-learning strategy reveal tectonic features and earthquake risk in the Sichuan-Yunnan region

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Ziyi Li, Lianqing Zhou, Mengqiao Duan, Yanru An, Zheng Wu, Lisheng Xu, Shiyong Zhou

Abstract

The Sichuan-Yunnan region is a critical tectonic zone for understanding continental deformation and seismic hazards. We developed a hybrid deep-learning strategy that integrates multi-scale phase picking and high-precision first-motion polarity identification, significantly improving regional seismic monitoring. This approach yielded a unified 2013-2022 high-resolution dataset, including -180,000 relocated events, 2,524 focal mechanisms, and a 0.25° × 0.25° stress field model. Our results reveal pronounced stress segmentation along the Longmenshan fault zone, driven by the interplay between regional tectonic compression and local fault geometry. Integrated analysis suggests that the structural complexity of the Dayi gap likely hinders gap-spanning ruptures. In contrast, the Zheduotang gap faces significantly elevated hazard due to persistent stress loading from the 2014 Kangding and 2022 Luding earthquakes. This unified high-resolution dataset provides a robust seismological framework for assessing geodynamic processes and future seismic risks in the region.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X54J4P

Subjects

Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

Machine-learning, Earthquake, Focal mechanism, Stress field, Seismic gap

Dates

Published: 2026-03-26 09:17

Last Updated: 2026-03-26 09:17

License

No Creative Commons license

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Data Availability:
The three-component waveform data involved in this study was provided by the China Earthquake Networks Center (https://www.cenc.ac.cn/). The relocation catalog, focal mechanisms catalog and stress field model are available from the author. The supplemental material accompanying this article includes details of the quality assessment, as well as a comparison with the manual catalog.

Metrics

Views: 15

Downloads: 1