Skip to main content
Land take futures under divergent urban growth scenarios: Cellular automata-based stress-testing for No Net Land Take targets

Land take futures under divergent urban growth scenarios: Cellular automata-based stress-testing for No Net Land Take targets

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Anasua Chakraborty , Ahmed Mustafa, Lien Poelmans, Jacques Teller

Abstract

Land take, the conversion of greenfield land into built-up areas, poses critical planning challenges for sustainable urban development, particularly as the EU Soil Strategy 2030 sets No Net Land Take (NNLT) by 2050 as a long-term objective for member states across Europe. Addressing this issue requires understanding the balance between outward urban expansion and inward urban densification. This study employs a Multinomial Logistic Regression-based Cellular Automata (MNL-CA) model to simulate two future scenarios of urban development until 2050 in Wallonia, Belgium, a region where, despite planning interventions promoting densification, land take rates remain persistently high, challenging conventional Business-As-Usual (BAU) projections. The model simulates two contrasting built-up demand scenarios. BAU follows a linear extrapolation of historical trends, representing a gradual slowdown of urban expansion and shift to densification. The second, Growth-As-Usual (GAU), applies a stress-test where urban expansion continues steadily through 2050. Under BAU, expansion rates decrease, stabilising at approximately 0 hectares per day by 2040, with total built-up area growing by 8,861 hectares (2.87%) by 2050, reflecting a progressive shift toward compact forms. By contrast, GAU produces ongoing expansion at 2.51 hectares per day in 2050, adding 27,347 hectares (8.87%) of built-up area, highlighting the risks of uncontrolled land consumption. Spatial metrics demonstrate that BAU fosters compact and contiguous development, whereas GAU results in fragmented urban forms that challenge the resilience of spatial planning policies. By evaluating both scenarios, our model provides a framework for stress-testing development strategies, enabling more robust assessments for regional NNLT commitments and sustainable land-use policy.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5ZN11

Subjects

Environmental Engineering, Environmental Studies, Geographic Information Sciences, Spatial Science

Keywords

Business-As-Usual, Scenario Modelling, Cellular Automata, Spatial Planning, Sustainable Cities and Communities, Scenario Modelling, Cellular Automata, Spatial Planning, Sustainable Cities and Communities

Dates

Published: 2026-04-01 17:38

Last Updated: 2026-10-04 18:55

Older Versions

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
The authors reported no potential conflict of interest.

Data Availability:
The code supporting this study, along with illustrative examples, is openly available on https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15163673

Metrics

Views: 506

Downloads: 265