Skip to main content
The Anthropocene as a Multi-Level Stability Landscape Regimes, Transitions, and Reorganization of the Human–Earth System

The Anthropocene as a Multi-Level Stability Landscape Regimes, Transitions, and Reorganization of the Human–Earth System

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Luis David Aimola

Abstract

Understanding the evolution of the human–Earth system over decadal-to-centennial timescales remains a central challenge in Earth system science. The Anthropocene is commonly described using trajectories, tipping elements, and scenario pathways, which capture non-linear dynamics but do not provide a unified representation of regime structure and transitions at planetary scale.
Here we introduce a conceptual framework in which the human–Earth system is represented as evolving within a multi-level stability landscape. In this representation, attractor basins correspond to alternative global configurations of human–biosphere interaction, and the Anthropocene is interpreted as a domain containing multiple regimes rather than a single trajectory. The landscape is hierarchically organized, with nested basins associated with distinct characteristic timescales.
The existence of such a landscape at planetary scale is introduced as a working hypothesis and evaluated in terms of its explanatory coherence. Within this framework, regimes are classified as viable, degraded, or crisis states, and transitions between them are path-dependent, asymmetric, and partially irreversible. The framework also represents transitions beyond the Anthropocene domain as shifts to alternative basins characterized by different modes of human–biosphere coupling.
By integrating hierarchical structure, transition asymmetry, and endogenous landscape evolution, the framework extends existing resilience and regime-shift approaches. It is conceptual and non-predictive, providing a structured representation of possible system configurations and their relationships rather than forecasting specific trajectories.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X58X87

Subjects

Earth Sciences, Environmental Sciences, Environmental Studies, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Social and Behavioral Sciences

Keywords

Anthropocene, human–Earth system, stability landscape, regime shifts, resilience, complex systems, Earth system dynamics

Dates

Published: 2026-04-03 07:22

Last Updated: 2026-04-03 07:22

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
none

Metrics

Views: 28

Downloads: 2