Skip to main content
Operational SAR Flood Mapping as a Full-Stack Systems Problem: An AI-Enabled Perspective

Operational SAR Flood Mapping as a Full-Stack Systems Problem: An AI-Enabled Perspective

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2026.1871753. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Qing Yang

Abstract

Flood mapping with synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has long been framed primarily as a problem of improving inundation detection algorithms. Although that framing has produced major advances, it increasingly understates what operational flood monitoring requires in practice. Useful flood products depend on the coordinated performance of data access, preprocessing, ancillary information, model logic, computational infrastructure, validation, and long-term maintenance. This perspective argues that SAR flood mapping should therefore be understood as a full-stack operational systems problem rather than only an algorithm-selection exercise. Building on the field's transition from prototype workflows to institutional operational services, the paper further argues that the present moment is especially important because mature SAR archives, accessible global ancillary datasets, scalable computing environments, and AI-agent systems now coexist. To ground that argument, the paper presents a real SIENA rebuilding case in which an AI-agent-assisted, human-supervised development process was used to restore and redesign an operational Sentinel-1 flood workflow, and summarizes comparative evidence from four quantitative evaluation settings using operational remote-sensing water and flood products and survey-style references, including VIIRS-FIM, NOAA Emergency Response Imagery, DSWX-HLS, and DSWX-S1. The resulting SIENA workflow now supports routine public production over CONUS and Alaska, with updates issued several times per day. The manuscript therefore advances a practical perspective for linking algorithmic components, system integration, and adaptive development, while emphasizing that AI-assisted workflows must remain grounded in hydrologic reasoning, validation, and human oversight to support timely and trustworthy flood monitoring.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5K483

Subjects

Earth Sciences, Hydrology

Keywords

AI, Remote Sensing, Hydrologic, Synthetic Aperture Radar(SAR), Operational System

Dates

Published: 2026-04-15 02:17

Last Updated: 2026-06-25 19:43

Older Versions

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Metrics

Views: 354

Downloads: 64