Skip to main content
A Report on Assumptions and Uncertainties in Modeling Nuclear Winter

A Report on Assumptions and Uncertainties in Modeling Nuclear Winter

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Madeline Berzak, Bennett Cullision, Yohana Eshetu, Nicolas Park

Abstract

Nuclear winter is arguably the biggest consequence of a nuclear war that the field seeks to prevent; experts study nuclear winter to prevent civilizational collapse and widespread catastrophe. A nuclear winter would be, for lack of better words, really bad. As long as the risk of nuclear war exists, so too will the catastrophic risk of a nuclear winter. Much of the modeling and research that exists on nuclear winter relies on several outdated assumptions or has been altered to elicit a specific political response, thus exaggerating or downplaying the severity. The nuclear field often conflates the ‘politically irrelevant’ with the ‘scientifically resolved.’ When certain questions fall out of political relevance, the field most often stops investigating them and considers them solved.
Over time, the nuclear field has become more narrowly focused on preventing nuclear war, and because of this, the field has largely failed to more rigorously re-examine and update the scientific foundations of our understanding of how a nuclear winter occurs and behaves. This report interrogates current nuclear winter models, relevant literature, and prevalent scientific research to more clearly identify and understand the assumptions and uncertainties that underpin the field’s understanding of nuclear winter.
The broader goal is to identify assumptions in the literature and evaluate how strongly each assumption is supported. In identifying these assumptions and uncertainties throughout the different phases of the nuclear winter mechanism chain, we both replicated methodologies from past models and developed new methodologies and conclusions to determine the validity of the assumptions themselves. Informed by this research, we developed a more comprehensive research agenda on where the field’s understanding of nuclear winter falls flat, and how more recent and multidisciplinary research can bolster analysis more broadly.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5BB7M

Subjects

Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

Nuclear Winter, Nuclear War, Effects of Nuclear Weapons, Climate Effects of Nuclear War, Atmospheric Dynamics, Soot Injection

Dates

Published: 2026-04-26 22:22

Last Updated: 2026-04-26 22:22

License

No Creative Commons license

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Metrics

Views: 30

Downloads: 0