Skip to main content
Rules-Based Systems Modeling for Hydropower Forecasting in Multi-Objective Reservoir Systems: Application to California's Central Valley Project

Rules-Based Systems Modeling for Hydropower Forecasting in Multi-Objective Reservoir Systems: Application to California's Central Valley Project

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Yash Vijay Amonkar , H.B. Zeff, Eric Mork, Konstantinos Oikonomou, Kelsey A Semrod, Gregory W Characklis

Abstract

Hydropower from large multi-objective reservoirs and water management projects constitutes the bulk of global reservoir-based generation. Yet accurate forecasting remains challenging because generation is governed not only by hydrology but by complex institutional rules, environmental regulations, and infrastructure constraints. This study demonstrates that a rules-based systems modeling approach, one that explicitly integrates water allocation institutions, operational constraints, and hydrological variability, produces significantly more accurate and financially valuable hydropower forecasts than purely statistical methods. This framework is applied to California's Central Valley Project (CVP) using CALFEWS, an open-source daily timestep rules-based model of the Central Valley, extended here to include the Trinity River Diversion System and its evolving environmental flow regulations. CALFEWS is validated against 20 years of operational hydropower data (2003–2023), achieving r² = 0.84 for monthly CVP hydropower generation. Herein, we develop a 12 month two-stage October–April hydropower forecasting approach, initialized with October storage conditions and historical climatology, that incorporates water year type classification in April. The resulting forecasts achieve high fidelity, nearly matching the skill of simulations with perfect inflow foresight. Compared to statistical baselines, CALFEWS reduces hydropower forecast errors by 40% (RMSE) and hydropower financial losses relative to historic baselines by 20% ($75–115 million over a decade). While demonstrated for the CVP, the framework is directly transferable to any multi-objective reservoir system where institutional rules and competing water demands govern hydropower generation, a condition common across the U.S. and globally.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5PF6C

Subjects

Civil and Environmental Engineering, Engineering, Environmental Engineering

Keywords

Central Valley Project, Hydropower, CALFEWS, Financial Risk

Dates

Published: 2026-05-03 02:48

Last Updated: 2026-05-03 02:48

License

CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data Availability:
All data used in this study are publicly available. Data and code to replicate this analysis, including instructions to download and run CALFEWS, are available at https://github.com/yashamonkar/CALFEWS_Hydro_Forecasting

Metrics

Views: 16

Downloads: 0