Skip to main content
A Mechanism Criterion Replaces Coupling Magnitude for Rainfall Inhibitory Skill Across Three Indo-Pacific Forcing Modes

A Mechanism Criterion Replaces Coupling Magnitude for Rainfall Inhibitory Skill Across Three Indo-Pacific Forcing Modes

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Pochender Shenigarapu , Sanjeeva Rayudu Ekkaluri

Abstract

CPAdry — the Conditional Precipitation Anomaly, dry phase — detects rainfall inhibitory mechanism failure across three forcing modes: the MJO (intraseasonal), ENSO, and IOD (interannual). Twenty assessments at eighteen Indo-Pacific sites using two-track methodology establish the governing principle: CPAdry returns meaningful skill only where the forcing mode imposes locally active inhibition — independent of coupling magnitude. At MJO direct-passage sites, diagnostic skill is strong and rising with lead time; at all passive sites, it collapses to chance, with the highest-coupled passive site — Colombo — serving as the central falsifying case. Across the ENSO/IOD arm, four active-mechanism sites spanning warm-pool displacement, Walker relay, thermocline-tilt, and extratropical Rossby wave pathways confirm the same bifurcation with high to moderate skill. Three cross-timescale synthesis findings emerge. First, MJO phase state does not condition ENSO/IOD skill (p = 0.94): ENSO and IOD establish the suppressive umbrella; MJO contributions are absorbed by the accumulation window. Second, a three-layer conditional suppression structure at Colombo reveals that NegIOD alone produces −11.6% suppressive anomaly, while NegIOD combined with active MJO produces −28.4% — neither crosses the −25% threshold alone. Third, this conditional suppressibility is unique to Colombo across the entire non-active network. The coupling-magnitude proxy is replaced by a sign-discriminated suppressive anomaly criterion that correctly classifies all twenty assessments without skill computation.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5DZ15

Subjects

Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

Subseasonal-to-Seasonal Prediction, Madden–Julian Oscillation, ENSO Teleconnections, Indian Ocean Dipole, Phase-Conditional Climatology, Rainfall Inhibitory Mechanisms

Dates

Published: 2026-05-02 23:05

Last Updated: 2026-05-02 23:05

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data Availability:
All datasets used in this study are publicly available at no cost. Daily precipitation data are from the NASA Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2), PRECTOTCORR variable, accessed via the NASA POWER portal (https://power.larc.nasa.gov). MJO phase and amplitude data are from the Wheeler–Hendon Real-time Multivariate MJO (RMM) index, Bureau of Meteorology archive (http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/mjo). ENSO phase data are the Niño3.4 SST anomaly index from the NOAA Climate Prediction Center (https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov). IOD phase data are the Dipole Mode Index from the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC; http://www.jamstec.go.jp). Point-scale gauge precipitation data for Darwin (BoM Station 014015) and Adelaide (BoM Station 023034) are accessible via the Bureau of Meteorology climate data portal subject to standard BoM data access conditions. (http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data)

Metrics

Views: 17

Downloads: 0