Skip to main content
Remotely sensed evapotranspiration for corporate water stewardship: Opportunities and limitations in agricultural landscapes

Remotely sensed evapotranspiration for corporate water stewardship: Opportunities and limitations in agricultural landscapes

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Sam Zipper , Rachel O'Connor, Gopal Penny, Derek Schlea, Garshaw Amidi-Abraham, Simone Schenkel, Maurice Hall

Abstract

Corporate water stewardship (CWS), in which companies engage in or incentivize actions to advance sustainable water management, can positively affect water resources, reduce water-related business risks, and support Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and sustainability reporting. Agricultural landscapes affect diverse industries including finance, technology, fuel production, insurance, and food/beverage companies but distributed agricultural supply chains make quantifying water use and impacts of CWS activities difficult. Here, we review and integrate literature related to CWS and remotely sensed evapotranspiration (RSET) in agricultural landscapes to identify opportunities and limitations for improved agricultural water management through CWS. First, we identify five key principles for hydrologic analysis to support effective CWS: variables should be scientifically-appropriate, actionable, spatially consistent but locally tailored, impact-focused at a relevant operational scale, and reproducible and verifiable. RSET has potential relevance for many CWS activities including understanding risks, setting corporate commitments, quantifying historic conditions, and outcome monitoring/reporting. Most directly, RSET methods provide a reproducible and verifiable input for calculating consumptive water use, which is the total evapotranspiration (ET) of a crop within a period of time such as a growing season and is often related to total agricultural water use. Calculating irrigation applications and/or withdrawals requires accounting for additional processes beyond ET and therefore involves additional modeling or monitoring approaches. There are many opportunities for RSET to integrate with CWS to advance agricultural water management, as long as care is taken to focus on suitable applications and communicate uncertainty.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5MF5C

Subjects

Earth Sciences, Environmental Sciences, Hydrology, Natural Resources and Conservation, Sustainability, Water Resource Management

Keywords

water stewardship, evapotranspiration, OpenET, agriculture, water resources management, irrigation, environmental stewardship

Dates

Published: 2026-05-07 17:02

Last Updated: 2026-08-14 07:21

Older Versions

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
See 'Declaration of competing interests' section of manuscript.

Data Availability:
No data used in manuscript.

Metrics

Views: 683

Downloads: 119