Skip to main content
Does Free Allocation Slow Decarbonization ? Installation-Level Evidence from the EU ETS, Phases III and IV

Does Free Allocation Slow Decarbonization ? Installation-Level Evidence from the EU ETS, Phases III and IV

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Farhad Zeynalli 

Abstract

Installations at high risk of carbon leakage receive free allowances from the European Union Emissions Trading System. Free allowances are allocated to prevent energy-intensive factories from relocating outside the EU. However, whether free allocation slows decarbonization remains an open question. In this paper, I test this question directly.
The panel was built at the installation-level. The data were obtained from the European Union Transaction Log (EUTL). In total, 112,787 installation-years from 2013 to 2023 were observed. To avoid the mechanical bias in derived variables such as surplus (total free allocations-verified emissions) and generosity ratio (total free allocations/verified emissions), free allocation was scaled by fixed base-year (2013) emissions and then lagged by one year. Log verified emissions was then regressed on the scaled variable and Two-Way Fixed Effects (TWFE) estimator with installation and year fixed effects was used.
The estimated effect is very small, close to zero. The coefficient is 0.0006 with a p-value of 0.78. A unit increase in scaled allocation changes emissions by 0.06%, and this is statistically insignificant. This indicates that large free allocations did not slow installation-level decarbonization in Phases III and IV.
The result remains true even without winsorization and when an emissions floor is added. It also holds when removing the 2020 pandemic year. Changing the outcome to emissions intensity using a Eurostat production index does not change the findings either. A difference-in-differences (DiD) test around the 2021 allocation cut gives a large negative coefficient. However, that estimate is invalidated by pre-trends. The Callaway & Sant’Anna, 2021 estimator finds no effect when installations losing most of their free allocation are compared with those losing almost none. Splitting that comparison by sector suggests the cut is associated with lower emissions only in the energy-intensive (carbon-leakage) manufacturing sectors. There are no detectable effect elsewhere. This localized pattern is suggestive rather than confirmed.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5249T

Subjects

Environmental Sciences, Environmental Studies, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Statistics and Probability

Keywords

EU ETS, Free allocation, carbon leakage, installation-level, difference-in-differences, staggered treatment

Dates

Published: 2026-07-01 05:49

Last Updated: 2026-07-01 05:49

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data Availability:
The data underlying this study are publicly available. Verified emissions and free allocation data are sourced from the EU Transaction Log (EUTL), published via the European Environment Agency (EEA) and the EUETS.INFO compilation. Sectoral production data are from Eurostat. Analysis codes are available at https://github.com/FarhadZeynalli/eu-ets-free-allocation

Metrics

Views: 70

Downloads: 2