This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Atmospheric Mineral Carbonation and the Case against Ca(OH)₂ Dispersal: A Four-Barrier Feasibility Analysis
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies are essential for climate stabilization, yet chemical plausibility does not guarantee practical viability. The atmospheric dispersal of Ca(OH)₂ exemplifies this gap. While the carbonation reaction is permanent and chemically straightforward, its deployment faces four critical barriers: a carbon-positive production cycle, uncontrollable ecological deposition, aerosol physics constraints and the absence of transboundary governance frameworks. This analysis demonstrates that these barriers represent fundamental domain-specific issues rather than mere technical hurdles. Collectively, they impede responsible deployment. This perspective offers an analytical screening framework for atmospheric intervention proposals, emphasizing that chemical elegance must correspond with ecological safety, governance legitimacy and spatial control before significant research investment occurs.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5PF7R
Subjects
Risk Analysis
Keywords
Dates
Published: 2026-07-16 17:32
Last Updated: 2026-07-16 17:32
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Data Availability:
None
Metrics
Views: 49
Downloads: 0
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.