Skip to main content
History-free spectral modelling of fractional seismic1 attenuation on fixed self-adjoint operators

History-free spectral modelling of fractional seismic1 attenuation on fixed self-adjoint operators

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files

Authors

Ning Hu, Shuqun Li, Chengtao Huang, Chuyang Hu

Abstract

Fractional wave models represent power-law attenuation and dispersion, but direct Caputo5 time stepping retains an increasingly long memory. We isolate the fixed-operator case in6 which a prescribed positive self-adjoint semidiscrete spatial operator is queried repeatedly at7 selected output times, receiver locations, or dense-basis source weights. Its fractional tem-8 poral evolution is evaluated directly by modal Mittag–Leffler functions, using dense eigende-9 composition for moderate systems and source-dependent Lanczos matrix actions for sparse10 irregular grids. The main evidence is deliberately compact: independent same-equation11 L1/Grunwald–Letnikov receiver checks on matched two- and small three-dimensional grids12 stay below a 1.5% waveform error gate without storing a time-history array; an irregular13 14,598-cell single-source Krylov test differs by 1.445% from an extended 240-vector reference14 at m = 120 and by 0.237% at m = 160; and the reuse threshold q∗ makes the setup-versus-15 query trade-off explicit. Dense eigenbases can be reused across source weights, whereas the16 tested Lanczos route is tied to its starting source vector and reused only across times and17 receivers. A prescribed smooth variable-space-order matrix is included as a bounded diagnos-18 tic, with a discontinuous-order counterexample preventing any general continuous-operator19 1 or sharp-interface claim. The result is therefore a reproducible requested-time evaluator20 and enabling computational gateway for richer fixed-operator fractional attenuation experi-21 ments, not a universal fractional-wave solver, full-waveform-inversion acceleration, field-scale22 production code, or non-self-adjoint absorbing-boundary method.Reproducibility materials are archived on Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21486072.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5ZR3T

Subjects

Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

Seismic attenuation; Wave propagation; Fractional wave equation; Numerical24 modelling; Computational seismology.

Dates

Published: 2026-07-22 15:24

Last Updated: 2026-07-22 15:24

Older Versions

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Data Availability:
Data Availability The data and code supporting this study are included in the submitted reproducibility bundle `paper1_code_data_supplement.final.zip`. Two public data sources are used: the published median values replotted from Sams et al. (1997) and the Cranfield VSP open data subset used for the real-data-informed diagnostic. All other results are synthetic and are fully reproducible from the supplied scripts, parameter files, and machine-readable CSV/JSON outputs. Upon acceptance, the same review bundle will be deposited in a persistent public repository and assigned a DOI.

Metrics

Views: 5

Downloads: 0