This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 4 of this Preprint.
Direct requested-time modelling of space--time fractional seismic attenuation on fixed operators
Downloads
Supplementary Files
Authors
Abstract
Space--time fractional attenuation models represent dissipative memory and effective nonlocal dispersion in seismic wave propagation, but Caputo history marching is expensive when only selected receiver--time responses are required. Matrix Mittag--Leffler representations are classical; their use as a costed fixed-model response-query workflow for seismic attenuation is less developed. We formulate the space--time Mittag--Leffler eigen-evaluator (ST--MLEE) for a fixed positive self-adjoint semidiscrete seismic operator \(A_\beta\), evaluating selected data as \(d_r(t)=r^T E_\alpha(-t^\alpha A_\beta)b\) instead of advancing through all preceding time levels. Modal implementations reuse the eigensystem across times, receivers and dense source weights. Standard sparse Lanczos projection is cheaper for large operators, but its basis is source-dependent. The comparison is reported through \(q_*\), \(\rho_t\) and \(\rho_r\), which measure setup amortisation, requested-time sparsity and receiver sparsity. Same-equation L1/Grunwald--Letnikov history solvers validate the receiver traces within the 1.5% waveform tolerance on matched two-dimensional and controlled three-dimensional tests. On the largest irregular operator, a source-perturbation scan places the first single-vector Lanczos reuse failure at \(\eta_b=0.015\). Smooth variable-order matrices can be queried in the same fixed-operator form, whereas sharp geological contacts and PML-type absorbing boundaries require separate interface or non-self-adjoint matrix-function treatments. For repeated fixed-operator queries with \(q\ge q_*\) and sparse output fractions \(\rho_t,\rho_r\ll1\), matrix-function evaluation can bypass full Caputo time stepping while preserving matched waveform accuracy.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5ZR3T
Subjects
Physical Sciences and Mathematics
Keywords
Seismic attenuation; Wave propagation; Fractional wave equation; Numerical24 modelling; Computational seismology.
Dates
Published: 2026-07-22 22:24
Last Updated: 2026-09-01 21:54
Older Versions
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Data Availability:
Data Availability The data and code supporting this study are included in the submitted reproducibility bundle `paper1_code_data_supplement.final.zip`. Two public data sources are used: the published median values replotted from Sams et al. (1997) and the Cranfield VSP open data subset used for the real-data-informed diagnostic. All other results are synthetic and are fully reproducible from the supplied scripts, parameter files, and machine-readable CSV/JSON outputs. Upon acceptance, the same review bundle will be deposited in a persistent public repository and assigned a DOI.
Metrics
Views: 476
Downloads: 98
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.