Skip to main content
Structured empirical waveform contamination in moment tensor inversion of shallow mining seismicity: A synthetic diagnostic framework

Structured empirical waveform contamination in moment tensor inversion of shallow mining seismicity: A synthetic diagnostic framework

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Sandro Giovani Gomes , Aderson Farias do Nascimento, José Augusto Fonsêca, Gilberto da Silva Leite Neto, Eduardo Alexandre Menezes, Reinhardt Fuck

Abstract

Full moment tensor inversion of shallow mining-induced seismicity is affected by sparse station coverage, near-surface effects, and structured waveform mismatch that is not adequately represented by random-noise assumptions. We present a synthetic diagnostic study using the Jacobina mining district, Brazil, as a realistic reference case for local network geometry, shallow source depths, and empirical waveform contamination. Tests were performed under three contamination regimes: band-limited Gaussian noise, phase-randomised empirical contamination, and structured empirical contamination constructed from small recorded events, thereby preserving source--path--site waveform structure. The phase-randomised case preserves the empirical amplitude spectrum while randomising temporal phase relationships, allowing the effects associated with the empirical amplitude spectrum to be distinguished from those associated with preserved temporal waveform structure. We compare conventional full-waveform inversion with a P--S segmented strategy and examine the effects of prescribed source case, depth, station geometry, and moment tensor constraints. Gaussian contamination produces smooth, variance-dominated degradation. Structured empirical contamination produces stronger mechanism errors and, for the CLVD-like, mixed, and double-couple cases, can inflate spurious non-double-couple components, whereas phase randomisation largely restores Gaussian-like behaviour. The ISO-dominant case remains comparatively stable in orientation but shows persistent decomposition bias. Denser station coverage reduces the amplitude and depth dependence of empirical-contamination errors, although residual degradation can persist at greater depths. P--S segmentation generally reduces sensitivity to structured contamination, especially where P- and S-wave packets are differentially perturbed. Constraint tests show that restrictive source parametrisations can produce solutions that are insensitive to increasing contamination but systematically biased when incompatible with the true mechanism. These results indicate that Gaussian-based thresholds should be treated as comparative stability references and that station geometry and phase-specific waveform treatment should be evaluated jointly when assessing inversion robustness under structured contamination.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5QZ2B

Subjects

Geophysics and Seismology

Keywords

Empirical waveform contamination, Seismic network geometry, Shallow seismicity, Moment tensor inversion, Mining-induced seismicity, Waveform inversion

Dates

Published: 2026-08-01 08:32

Last Updated: 2026-08-01 08:32

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data Availability:
The numerical results underlying the main and supplementary figures, the machine-readable parameter tables, the synthetic-test configuration files, and the scripts used for waveform contamination, phase randomisation, inversion processing, data summarization, and figure generation are archived in Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21651740. The raw continuous waveform data and detailed station and mining-site metadata are not publicly available because they are subject to ongoing-study and data-use restrictions. Access is administered by LabSis/UFRN and requires prior written authorisation from the relevant data owner. These restrictions do not apply to the synthetic results, scripts, and derived numerical products deposited in Zenodo.

Metrics

Views: 36

Downloads: 1