This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JF004611. This is version 3 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Supplementary Files
Authors
Abstract
Fire frequency and severity are increasing in high latitude regions, but the degree to which groundwater flow impacts the response of permafrost to fire remains poorly understood. Here, we use the Anaktuvuk River Fire (Alaska, USA) as an example for simulating groundwater-permafrost interactions following fire. We identify key thermal and hydrologic parameters controlling permafrost response to fire both with and without groundwater flow, and separate the relative influence of changes to the water and energy balances on active layer thickness. Our results show that mineral soil porosity, which influences the bulk subsurface thermal conductivity, is a key parameter controlling active layer response to fire in both the absence and presence of groundwater flow. However, neglecting groundwater flow increases the perceived importance of subsurface thermal properties, such as the thermal conductivity of soil solids, and decreases the perceived importance of hydrologic properties, such as the soil permeability. Furthermore, we demonstrate that changes to the energy balance (increased soil temperature) drive increased active layer thickness following fire, while changes to the water balance (decreased groundwater recharge) lead to reduced landscape-scale variability in active layer thickness and groundwater discharge to surface water features such as streams. These results indicate that explicit consideration of groundwater flow is critical to understanding how permafrost environments respond to fire.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/osf.io/27s3z
Subjects
Earth Sciences, Environmental Sciences, Hydrology, Physical Sciences and Mathematics
Keywords
hydrogeology, groundwater, groundwater recharge, Cryosphere, Permafrost, fire, active layer, disturbance hydrology
Dates
Published: 2018-02-21 18:14
Last Updated: 2018-09-12 19:01
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.