Skip to main content
A Quantitative Feasibility Model for Singapore Waste-to-Energy Ash as a Zeolitic Material Feedstock

A Quantitative Feasibility Model for Singapore Waste-to-Energy Ash as a Zeolitic Material Feedstock

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Pratham Gaurav Tewari 

Abstract

In Singapore’s waste management system, waste-to-energy ash is a major by-product but is viewed as a residue to be managed rather than a material resource. This paper examines whether Singapore waste-to-energy ash could be used as a feedstock for zeolitic material synthesis, when assessed through a quantitative feasibility model rather than a descriptive review. In this study a mathematical framework is developed based on five criteria - technical suitability, environmental safety, scalability, cost plausibility, and circular resource value. The model also includes two threshold conditions and a nonlinear penalty for impurity or risk burden. This ensures that feasibility is treated as a constrained and a multi-factor problem rather than a general sustainability claim. The aim of this paper is not to prove from scratch that ash-to-zeolitic conversion is scientifically possible, as supported in the wider literature, instead this paper assesses if this pathway is realistic in the Singapore context. The baseline model produces a feasibility score of F = 0.351, indicating qualified but constrained feasibility. Sensitivity analysis produces scores between F = 0.323 and F = 0.382 under plausible variations in model assumptions, while stricter technical or environmental threshold conditions reduce the feasibility score to F = 0. By shifting focus on Singapore-specific implementation feasibility from general scientific possibility, the paper positions ash-valorisation as a higher-value circular materials question rather than only a waste management issue. The results indicate that such a pathway represents a credible but condition-dependent higher-value ash-valorisation option, rather than an immediate alternative to current reuse approaches.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5NF7F

Subjects

Civil and Environmental Engineering, Engineering, Engineering Science and Materials, Environmental Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, Other Materials Science and Engineering

Keywords

Waste-to-energy ash, feasibility modelling, zeolitic material, Singapore, resource recovery, sensitivity analysis, waste-derived materials, sustainability, circular economy

Dates

Published: 2026-08-28 07:33

Last Updated: 2026-08-29 02:31

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Metrics

Views: 42

Downloads: 11