Skip to main content
Bounded at both ends: the detection window of routine 12-day C-band InSAR at rock–ice avalanche sources

Bounded at both ends: the detection window of routine 12-day C-band InSAR at rock–ice avalanche sources

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Ajay Kumar Sah 

Abstract

A negative result from satellite radar — "no precursory deformation was detected" — carries no information unless the range of signals the measurement could have detected is reported alongside it. We measure that range at two rock–ice avalanche sources, Langtang Lirung, Nepal (2026) and Ronti Peak, India (2021), using a single procedure, and identify four determinants of it that are site-specific and not predictable from the sensor specification.

Viewing geometry cannot be selected on usable-pixel fraction, the quantity most easily computed before processing: at Langtang an ascending track covering 100 per cent of the source disc has 4.1 times the variance of a descending track covering 44 per cent, and the failure is invisible on the former (z = −0.52) while the latter registers it at z = +3.65. The limiting seasonal term is variance rather than offset, and so cannot be detrended away: nine same-window February controls at Ronti span 6.95 to 32.11 per cent of the source disc below a coherence threshold, a range wider than any plausible precursor. Control design does not transfer; the published 120-disc scheme admits 46 candidates at Ronti, aspect-limited. And the upper bound is rarely stated at all. Placed against the half-fringe unwrapping limit of a 12-day pair, no published precursory detection we examined lies inside the range a single pair can measure — three sit at or below its floor, three at or above its ceiling, and every one was obtained by multi-epoch inversion accumulated over years rather than from the routine product.

Neither event is detectable at its source in routine 12-day C-band products, for opposite reasons: one below the precision floor, one above the unwrapping ceiling. The sensitivity range is bounded at both ends, both bounds are site-specific and differ by an order of magnitude between sites of the same hazard class, and a null reported without them is not interpretable.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X58J72

Subjects

Earth Sciences, Geomorphology

Keywords

Sentinel-1, InSAR coherence, detection limits, phase unwrapping, rock–ice avalanche, precursor detection, Himalaya, Chamoli, Langtang, Nepal

Dates

Published: 2026-09-13 23:26

Last Updated: 2026-09-13 23:26

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data Availability:
10.5281/zenodo.22728130

Metrics

Views: 44

Downloads: 1