Skip to main content
Evaluations of Climate-Informed Early Warning Systems for Foodborne, Waterborne, and Vector-Borne Diseases: A Scoping Review

Evaluations of Climate-Informed Early Warning Systems for Foodborne, Waterborne, and Vector-Borne Diseases: A Scoping Review

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Maya M. Rao , Katherine R. O’Brien, Afrin Iqbal, Sarah E. Dumas, Timothy H. Holtz

Abstract

Climate change is altering infectious disease risk over time and across geographies. These changing risks can negatively impact human health and pose challenges to health systems. Anticipating outbreaks before they happen and implementing adaptive measures can help reduce the burden of climate-sensitive infectious diseases. Climate-informed early warning systems (CIEWS) are integrated systems of climate and infectious disease risk monitoring, forecasting, and prediction that inform communication and preparedness efforts for timely action to reduce disease risk in advance of hazardous events. CIEWS can provide critical information for public health systems to adapt to the changing risk of infectious diseases. While extensive research has advanced predictive models for potential use in CIEWS, evidence of the effectiveness of these tools once operationalized has not been well described. In this scoping review, we examine the evidence base evaluating operational CIEWS targeting foodborne, waterborne, and vector-borne diseases. We conducted a search in Global Index Medicus, Scopus, and PubMed. Of the 9,917 unique articles screened, 21 met eligibility criteria. Included articles described 17 unique CIEWS and spanned five WHO regions (the Americas, Western Pacific, Africa, South-East Asia, and Eastern Mediterranean). All but one article presented a CIEWS for a vector-borne disease, with dengue most prominently represented. Most evaluations of CIEWS focused on statistical performance of the model, with only two evaluations of CIEWS effectiveness, and four evaluations of the system’s operational features. There are significant evidence gaps and a need for more research to demonstrate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of operational CIEWS, particularly for foodborne and waterborne diseases. Evaluations of CIEWS are critical for ensuring systems are useful, usable, and effectively informing anticipatory action for climate-sensitive infectious diseases.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5BB9C

Subjects

Public Health

Keywords

forecasting models, climate-sensitive infectious diseases, surveillance systems, infectious disease prevention, climate-health adaptation, public health system evaluation, climate services for health, prediction tools

Dates

Published: 2026-09-17 01:19

Last Updated: 2026-09-17 01:19

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Metrics

Views: 79

Downloads: 1