Skip to main content
Sparse validation can mask process errors in urban flood modelling: evidence from large multimodal model-assisted video observations

Sparse validation can mask process errors in urban flood modelling: evidence from large multimodal model-assisted video observations

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Shunan Zhou , Heng Lyu, Anette Etner, Pedro Zamboni, Nan Wang, Jiaxing Zhao, Chi Zhang

Abstract

Urban flood models support drainage-system planning and flood risk management. However, due to the scarcity of monitoring data, model calibration and validation often rely on sparse observations, leaving the process fidelity of models insufficiently assessed. Here, we used large multimodal model-assisted video interpretation to derive minute-level ordinal inundation observations and evaluate the process fidelity of a sparsely calibrated urban flood model. In a case study of Dalian, China, a 1D–2D MIKE FLOOD model was calibrated using five historical peak-depth estimates and validated using three, then evaluated using 20,825 paired simulated and video-derived inundation levels. Direct comparison quantified errors in inundation occurrence, timing, severity, and duration, and two Bayesian cumulative link mixed models characterised their variation across flood phases and rainfall–site conditions. Results showed that although the model achieved low calibration and validation RMSEs of 0.107 and 0.084 m against peak-depth references, video observations revealed its insufficient process fidelity. Simulated onset was delayed by a median of 28.5 min where visible flooding was reproduced, and visible-inundation duration was a median of 29.5 min shorter than observed across all segments. The phase model estimated the highest underestimation probability of 73.6% during the observation-defined peak phase. Underestimation was also more likely with greater rainfall accumulation over the preceding 30 min, which had the strongest association among the rainfall and site covariates (conditional odds ratio = 6.48). These findings show that sparse peak-depth validation can leave errors in street-scale inundation processes undetected. Future studies should delineate the reliability boundaries of urban flood models using process-informed observations.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X50R5W

Subjects

Hydraulic Engineering

Keywords

urban flooding, inundation dynamics, large multimodal models, surveillance videos, ordinal regression

Dates

Published: 2026-09-23 06:30

Last Updated: 2026-09-23 06:30

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Data Availability:
The code and derived data supporting this study are publicly available from Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21728327

Metrics

Views: 28

Downloads: 7